![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proposed Bangladesh Budget 2008-09 : Planning Disaster Leading to Debt Disaster Budget ignored justified and equitable distribution of resources among the poor |
|||||||||||||||||||
Dhaka 12 June 2008: Equity and Justice Working Group (equitybd) has
organized a post budget dialogue on the proposed national budget of
Bangladesh of the financial year 2008 – 2009. The dialogue was to
facilitate people’s expectations to fed into the proposed one. A number of
civil society organizations , representatives of different professional
group, In overall equitybd has mentioned that the budget has very little link to
the underline root causes of the present food and fuel crisis and also the
poverty situation. The budget has prepared in a very a populist approach,
taking consideration of shot term remedies of the crucial problems, but in
fact which in turn will lead to the long term problems of debt disaster. Sayed Aminul Haque in his key note presentation on proposed budget said;
although the budget proposed increased amount of allocation to social
safety net projects and to other prime sectors like agriculture but these
subsidy likely to benefit urban middle class and rural elites. Syed Aminul
commented social safety net dominated budget as the budget of charity
approach, which is only to satisfy immediate needs not really looking at
the long term measures for poverty reduction. The proposed budget is
heavily relied on deficit financing from the external sources, which will
make country more indebted to the international financial institutions and
domestic banking sectors. Syed Aminul pointed that the government could
follow the recommendations of Public Expenditure Review Committee (PERC),
which has been framed while 4-party alliance was in power. Again, analysis In the open discussion many of the discussant indicated power and agriculture subsidy as discriminatory and unjustified while around 90 percent of these subsidy is being spent to satisfy luxury of urban and other middle class population.. Speakers in the dialogue demanded withdrawal of fossil fuel subsidy from the non-agriculture/ non-productive sectors. They also proposed several specific recommendation to reduce fossil fuel dependency; like obligatory utilization of energy efficient bulbs, fixing air condition at 26 degree temperature, car free day in a week, advancing one hour for optimum use of day light, limited and controlled utilization of government vehicles (please note that government consume more then 30 % fuel at present), promotion of solar energy, making public transport system poor people friendly, construction of bicycle lane in all the city road, ban on the import of high CC cars etc. The speakers also opposed the present concept of attaining food security
as this concept undermines farmers and peoples’ rights on production
system, indigenous knowledge, seeds and make farmer dependent on
multi-national companies for agricultural inputs. |
Budget Highlights 2008-09 | ||||||||||||||||||
and 1.9% of GDP) and in Health sector is 58620 million (5.6% of total budget and 0.95% of GDP)
budget) will benefit urban middle class and rural elites and virtually will not create any impact of poverty reduction
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Online Media Coverage:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||